Average

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 69
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:12 pm
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

Average

by Nidhs » Sun Mar 09, 2008 6:01 pm
A certain car averages 25 miles per gallon of gasoline when driven in the city and 40 miles per gallon when driven on the highway. According to these rates the following is the closest to the number of miles per gallon that the car averages when it is driven at 10 miles in the city and then 50 miles on the highway?
1)28
2)30
3)33
4)36
5)38

Ans is D. Can somebody please explain.

Legendary Member
Posts: 645
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 4:37 am
Location: India
Thanked: 34 times
Followed by:5 members

Re: Average

by camitava » Sun Mar 09, 2008 9:11 pm
Nidhs wrote:A certain car averages 25 miles per gallon of gasoline when driven in the city and 40 miles per gallon when driven on the highway. According to these rates the following is the closest to the number of miles per gallon that the car averages when it is driven at 10 miles in the city and then 50 miles on the highway?
1)28
2)30
3)33
4)36
5)38

Ans is D. Can somebody please explain.
In City, gasoline used = 10/25 = 2/5
In high-way, gasoline used = 50/40 = 5/4
So in total gasoline used = (2/5 + 5/4) = 33/20
Total distance travelled = 60
So avg mileage = 60 * 20 / 33 = 1200 / 33 ~ 36. So IMO D.
Correct me If I am wrong


Regards,

Amitava

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 3:16 pm

by wrtau23 » Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:34 pm
Why is the logic below incorrect??

1/6 of the miles driven was based on 25 miles per gallon.

5/6 of miles driven was based on 40 miles per gallon.

25 * 1/6 + 40 * 5/6 = 225/6 ~ 38

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:27 am
Thanked: 7 times

by welcome » Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:30 am
In City 25 miles in 1 Hr.
so 1 mile in 1/25 Hrs.
=> 10 minles in 10/25 Hrs


In highway 40 miles in 1 hr
so 1 mile in 1/40 hrs.
=> 50 miles in 50/40 hrs.


total time in (10 + 50) mile = 10/25 + 50/40.

so avg miles in one Hrs(rate) = 60/(10/25 + 50/40) = 36.3

Answer = D

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 11:06 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by rajataga » Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:07 am
I applied weighted averages,

[25(10) + 40(50)]/(10+50) = 37.5

what am i doing wrong?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 11:06 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by rajataga » Fri Jan 09, 2009 5:46 am
Even wrtau followed the same method, and has the same question.

Has PMed to Ian to check it.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2621
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:04 am
rajataga wrote:I applied weighted averages,

[25(10) + 40(50)]/(10+50) = 37.5

what am i doing wrong?
It's very tempting to do just that, but unfortunately, it's not quite correct. It might be easier to see why by using a different problem:

Al drives 120 miles at 60 miles per hour, and 120 miles at 30 miles per hour. What was his average speed?

If you treat this as a weighted average, and you use the ratio of the distances as your weights, you'd incorrectly think his average speed was 45 miles per hour. This is a weighted average problem, but it's weighted by the time spent at each speed, not by the distance traveled at each speed: because Al spends twice as long driving at 30 mph, his average speed will be 'twice as close' to 30 as it is to 60. In other words, his average speed will be 40 mph.

The same is true for the question in the original post above. If you want to treat it as a weighted average question, you can't use the distances as your weights; you need to use the gallons as your weights. This can get a bit confusing, so my advice would be to avoid using weighted average principles when dealing with any kind of rate or ratio, as in an average speed problem or a problem like the above, unless you really know what you're doing. Otherwise it's easy to get a wrong answer.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 11:06 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by rajataga » Fri Jan 09, 2009 7:53 am
Thanks.

I had thought about the same point, but then went ahead with it, thinking that there wasnt a time factor involved.

Thanks again.