Probability Question

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 11:35 am
Thanked: 1 times

Probability Question

by chrisjim5 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 6:48 am
Here is a question:

The employees of a certain company include exactly 4 men and 4 women. If 5 employees are to be selected at random, what is the probability that all of the women are selected?

Please let me know how to solve this ...

Thanks ...

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:44 am
Location: London
Thanked: 70 times
Followed by:3 members

by kmittal82 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:01 am
Total employeed = 8
Number to be selected = 5

Total ways to select 5 employees out of 8 = 8C5

#ways of selecting all women = #ways of selecting 1 man * #ways of selecting 4 women = 4C1x4C4 = 4x1 = 4

Thus, probability = 4/8C5 = 4/56 = 1/14

OA?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:15 am
chrisjim5 wrote:Here is a question:

The employees of a certain company include exactly 4 men and 4 women. If 5 employees are to be selected at random, what is the probability that all of the women are selected?

Please let me know how to solve this ...

Thanks ...
Another approach:

P(WWWWM) = 4/8 * 3/7 * 2/6 * 1/5 * 4/4 = 1/70.

Since M can appear in any of the 5 positions, we multiply by 5:

5*(1/70) = 1/14.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 11:35 am
Thanked: 1 times

by chrisjim5 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:20 am
Thats right ...

Thanks for explaining ...

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 991
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:19 am
Location: Bangalore, India
Thanked: 146 times
Followed by:24 members

by shovan85 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:23 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
chrisjim5 wrote:Here is a question:

The employees of a certain company include exactly 4 men and 4 women. If 5 employees are to be selected at random, what is the probability that all of the women are selected?

Please let me know how to solve this ...

Thanks ...
Another approach:

P(WWWWM) = 4/8 * 3/7 * 2/6 * 1/5 * 4/4 = 1/70.

Since M can appear in any of the 5 positions, we multiply by 5:

5*(1/70) = 1/14.
Why the following method is getting wrong Please clarify?

WWWWM, WWWMW, WWMWW, WMWWW, MWWWW = 5 possibilities with 4 W and 1 M

Total possibilities = 8C5 = 56

Why not 5/56 ?
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 905
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:38 am
Thanked: 378 times
Followed by:123 members
GMAT Score:760

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:33 am
shovan85 wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
chrisjim5 wrote:Here is a question:

The employees of a certain company include exactly 4 men and 4 women. If 5 employees are to be selected at random, what is the probability that all of the women are selected?

Please let me know how to solve this ...

Thanks ...
Another approach:

P(WWWWM) = 4/8 * 3/7 * 2/6 * 1/5 * 4/4 = 1/70.

Since M can appear in any of the 5 positions, we multiply by 5:

5*(1/70) = 1/14.
Why the following method is getting wrong Please clarify?

WWWWM, WWWMW, WWMWW, WMWWW, MWWWW = 5 possibilities with 4 W and 1 M

Total possibilities = 8C5 = 56

Why not 5/56 ?
The two are just incompatible: 8C5 is the number of ways of choosing 5 out of 8, order doesn't matter plays around with combinations of all 4 men), while the 5 options actually assumes a single man and order matters. Whatever, you do, be consistent: either order matters in both top and bottom, or it doesn't.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:35 am
shovan85 wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
chrisjim5 wrote:Here is a question:

The employees of a certain company include exactly 4 men and 4 women. If 5 employees are to be selected at random, what is the probability that all of the women are selected?

Please let me know how to solve this ...

Thanks ...
Another approach:

P(WWWWM) = 4/8 * 3/7 * 2/6 * 1/5 * 4/4 = 1/70.

Since M can appear in any of the 5 positions, we multiply by 5:

5*(1/70) = 1/14.
Why the following method is getting wrong Please clarify?

WWWWM, WWWMW, WWMWW, WMWWW, MWWWW = 5 possibilities with 4 W and 1 M

Total possibilities = 8C5 = 56

Why not 5/56 ?
You're mixing up methods.

8C5 counts the number ways to combine 5 out of 8 choices.

WWWWM, WWWMW, WWMWW, WMWWW, MWWWW = 5 = the number of ways to arrange the 5 letters WWWWM. (We could also determine this by saying the number of ways to arrange WWWWM = 5!/4! = 5.)

You can't put arrangements/combinations.

Does this help?
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:46 am
Thanked: 3 times

by abhishekg21 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:42 am
you are taking into account the order or arrangement.Where as in commitee it does not matter. wwwwm is same as mwwww.
so remove the arrangment from your answer and you will correct figure of 1/14

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 991
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:19 am
Location: Bangalore, India
Thanked: 146 times
Followed by:24 members

by shovan85 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:49 am
Geva Stern wrote: The two are just incompatible: 8C5 is the number of ways of choosing 5 out of 8, order doesn't matter plays around with combinations of all 4 men), while the 5 options actually assumes a single man and order matters. Whatever, you do, be consistent: either order matters in both top and bottom, or it doesn't.
Finally I guess I got it...

5 possibilities if I take as WWWWM, WWWMW, WWMWW, WMWWW, MWWWW then order matters. Using Combinatorics I got 1/14 but the picture was not getting clear in my mind as I had taken W1,W2...

So I was taking the upper part with respect to Arrangement but was considering the formula of Combinatorics.

Using Permutations it will be 5*(4P4 * 4P1)/8P5 = 1/14.

Not a good idea but I have a clear picture now ;)

Thanks Geva Stern I was not able to see this
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 991
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 6:19 am
Location: Bangalore, India
Thanked: 146 times
Followed by:24 members

by shovan85 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 7:51 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:You're mixing up methods.

8C5 counts the number ways to combine 5 out of 8 choices.

WWWWM, WWWMW, WWMWW, WMWWW, MWWWW = 5 = the number of ways to arrange the 5 letters WWWWM. (We could also determine this by saying the number of ways to arrange WWWWM = 5!/4! = 5.)

You can't put arrangements/combinations.

Does this help?
Thanks it helps a lot Never mind it was a stupid Question after all
and no more Maths for me today ;)
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it