A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly a result from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.
a.
b. that creatures of the seabed were suffering because food supplies were dwindling, possibly as a result of an increase in.
c, d, and e were ridiculous.
as far as I can see, with A, the result from is an incorrect idiom. is there anything else wrong with A other than the "result from" idiom?
GMAT claims it is ambiguous what "possibly a result.." modifies. creatures of a seabed, or dwindling food supplies, but how does B correct it? and why is A ambiguous? seems to me as it is modifying food supplies pretty clearly.
Food sources
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:59 pm
- Thanked: 17 times
- Followed by:4 members
- GMAT Score:720
I think the main issue with (A) is meaning. possibly a result attached to food supplies makes it sound as if the food supplies themselves were the result and that is not the intended meaning.
I personally don't think "result from" is wrong...depends on the context in which it is used.
Hope this helps!
I personally don't think "result from" is wrong...depends on the context in which it is used.
Hope this helps!
- sui generis
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:07 am
- Thanked: 1 times
- Followed by:2 members
Official explanation states that the appositive "possibly a result" is ambiguous as to what is being modified - creatures of a seabed or dwindling food supplies.
A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly a result from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.
I am not clear why isn't the appositive unambiguously referring to the red part (as it has the S&V) whereas blue part just a prep. phrase.
Can any expert please explain.
Thanks
A study of food resources in the North Pacific between 1989 and 1996 revealed that creatures of the seabed were suffering from dwindling food supplies, possibly a result from increasing sea surface temperatures during the same period.
I am not clear why isn't the appositive unambiguously referring to the red part (as it has the S&V) whereas blue part just a prep. phrase.
Can any expert please explain.
Thanks