Which one these constructions is correct ?
a) He was told he could not leave
b) He was told that he could not leave
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
THAT usage
This topic has expert replies
-
ranjit_ece
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 5:55 pm
-
vineeshp
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 965
- Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:52 am
- Thanked: 156 times
- Followed by:34 members
- GMAT Score:720
Second usage is correct.
It is commonplace in spoken language to eliminate THAT, but when it is essential, it must not be eliminated.
It is commonplace in spoken language to eliminate THAT, but when it is essential, it must not be eliminated.
Vineesh,
Just telling you what I know and think. I am not the expert.
Just telling you what I know and think. I am not the expert.
-
ranjit_ece
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 5:55 pm
Thanks vineeshp
I also thought the same, but was thrown off by the answer to this question.I can understand from the POE point of view that the best option is B, but then even that violates ( or may be not ?) the grammatical rule
The suspect in the burglary was advised of his right to remain silent, told he could not leave, and was interrogated in a detention room.
(A) of his right to remain silent, told he could not leave, and was
(B) of his right to remain silent, told he could not leave, and
(C) of his right to remain silent and that he could not leave and
(D) that he had a right to remain silent, could not leave, and was
(E) that he had a right to remain silent, that he could not leave, and was
I also thought the same, but was thrown off by the answer to this question.I can understand from the POE point of view that the best option is B, but then even that violates ( or may be not ?) the grammatical rule
The suspect in the burglary was advised of his right to remain silent, told he could not leave, and was interrogated in a detention room.
(A) of his right to remain silent, told he could not leave, and was
(B) of his right to remain silent, told he could not leave, and
(C) of his right to remain silent and that he could not leave and
(D) that he had a right to remain silent, could not leave, and was
(E) that he had a right to remain silent, that he could not leave, and was
-
adi_800
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:14 am
- Location: Pune, India
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:2 members
Which option you are finding hard to eliminate..ranjit_ece wrote:Thanks vineeshp
I also thought the same, but was thrown off by the answer to this question.I can understand from the POE point of view that the best option is B, but then even that violates ( or may be not ?) the grammatical rule
The suspect in the burglary was advised of his right to remain silent, told he could not leave, and was interrogated in a detention room.
(A) of his right to remain silent, told he could not leave, and was
(B) of his right to remain silent, told he could not leave, and
(C) of his right to remain silent and that he could not leave and
(D) that he had a right to remain silent, could not leave, and was
(E) that he had a right to remain silent, that he could not leave, and was
we have ||sm being tested here... You have three actions and these three action must be stated in passive voices as you should be advised/told/interrogated..
So was in the first was advised is common to all and hence B comes out to be the answer...
-
ranjit_ece
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 5:55 pm
Adi,
the doubt is exactly what i asked in my first post
when the correct construcion as pointed out by vineeshp is second one .. then howcome the rule is not applicable in option B. I hope that clarifies what I am asking.
the doubt is exactly what i asked in my first post
when the correct construcion as pointed out by vineeshp is second one .. then howcome the rule is not applicable in option B. I hope that clarifies what I am asking.
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
e-GMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: US
- Thanked: 527 times
- Followed by:227 members
a) He was told he could not leave
b) He was told that he could not leave
Both sentences are correct.
Here "that" is used as a conjunction to connect two clauses. Note that it is not used as a relative pronoun here.
So in such cases when there is no ambiguity about the meaning of the sentence, we can safely omit that.
However, in certain other cases, omitting that may not be a good idea. For example:
1: He was told yesterday the inspection team left for the project. - Ambiguous
2: He was told yesterday that the inspection team left for the project. - Clear - yesterday describes when he was told.
3: He was told that yesterday the inspection team left for the project. - Clear - yesterday is part of second clause and now describes when the team left.
3B: He was told that the inspection team left for the project yesterday. - Better version of sentence 3.
So essentially you may "omit" when it plays the role of a conjunction as long as the MEANING is clear.
b) He was told that he could not leave
Both sentences are correct.
Here "that" is used as a conjunction to connect two clauses. Note that it is not used as a relative pronoun here.
So in such cases when there is no ambiguity about the meaning of the sentence, we can safely omit that.
However, in certain other cases, omitting that may not be a good idea. For example:
1: He was told yesterday the inspection team left for the project. - Ambiguous
2: He was told yesterday that the inspection team left for the project. - Clear - yesterday describes when he was told.
3: He was told that yesterday the inspection team left for the project. - Clear - yesterday is part of second clause and now describes when the team left.
3B: He was told that the inspection team left for the project yesterday. - Better version of sentence 3.
So essentially you may "omit" when it plays the role of a conjunction as long as the MEANING is clear.
Register for free live sessions
Sentence Correction: Get 4 free video lessons, 50 practice questions
Critical Reasoning workshop: Get 4 free video lessons, 40 practice questions
Reading Comprehension: Get 2 free video lessons and 2 free eBooks
Free Strategy Session: Key strategy to score 760
Success Stories
V27 to V42 | V28 to V48 | V25 to V38 | More Success Stories
Sentence Correction: Get 4 free video lessons, 50 practice questions
Critical Reasoning workshop: Get 4 free video lessons, 40 practice questions
Reading Comprehension: Get 2 free video lessons and 2 free eBooks
Free Strategy Session: Key strategy to score 760
Success Stories
V27 to V42 | V28 to V48 | V25 to V38 | More Success Stories
-
missionGMATverbal
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:02 am
- Thanked: 2 times
Thanks for explaining this. Can you comment on Question 7 in OG12. Is the same thing happening there too.
As its sales of computer products have surpassed those of measuring instruments, the company has become increasingly willing to compete for the mass market sales they would in the past have conceded to rivals.
(A) they would in the past have conceded to rivals
(B) they would have conceded previously to their rivals
(C) that in the past would have been conceded previously to rivals
(D) it previously would have conceded to rivals in the past
(E) it would in the past have conceded to rivals
OA E
As its sales of computer products have surpassed those of measuring instruments, the company has become increasingly willing to compete for the mass market sales they would in the past have conceded to rivals.
(A) they would in the past have conceded to rivals
(B) they would have conceded previously to their rivals
(C) that in the past would have been conceded previously to rivals
(D) it previously would have conceded to rivals in the past
(E) it would in the past have conceded to rivals
OA E
-
aspirant2011
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
missionGMATverbal wrote:Thanks for explaining this. Can you comment on Question 7 in OG12. Is the same thing happening there too.
As its sales of computer products have surpassed those of measuring instruments, the company has become increasingly willing to compete for the mass market sales they would in the past have conceded to rivals.
(A) they would in the past have conceded to rivals
(B) they would have conceded previously to their rivals
(C) that in the past would have been conceded previously to rivals------ambiguous as who conceded the sales?????
(D) it previously would have conceded to rivals in the past------redundancy
(E) it would in the past have conceded to rivals
OA E
