SC: With surface temperatures estimated at minus 230 degrees

This topic has expert replies

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Tue Mar 02, 2010 2:43 am
oh, and by the way:
Ex

With surface temperatures estimated at minus 230 degrees Farenheit, Jupiter's moon Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, its 60 square miles of water ARE thought to be frozen from top to bottom

Please help
this would be incorrect. it's a run-on sentence.

the orange part is a complete sentence, and the words after the comma (with your "are") are another complete sentence.

you can't have the construction complete sentence + COMMA + complete sentence. that's called a run-on (comma splice) and is ALWAYS wrong.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:42 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by vineetbatra » Fri Apr 23, 2010 3:52 pm
Ron,

Thanks for the explanation, but what does "thought" as-is acting as in choice B. Isn't it simple past, so why doesn't it make this sentence run-on.

I do see that "thought" as a verb in B would be an incomplete because thought by whom? I am just not able to understand what it is acting as?

Thanks,

Vineet

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Sat Apr 24, 2010 12:39 am
vineetbatra wrote:Ron,

Thanks for the explanation, but what does "thought" as-is acting as in choice B. Isn't it simple past, so why doesn't it make this sentence run-on.

I do see that "thought" as a verb in B would be an incomplete because thought by whom? I am just not able to understand what it is acting as?

Thanks,

Vineet
it's not a past-tense verb; it's actually a PAST PARTICIPLE. in other words, it's in the same class as words such as
dedicated
considered
thrown
taken


the reason why this is a difficult recognition, in this case, is that the past-tense form ("thought"), for this particular verb, looks exactly the same as the past participle form ("thought"). in fact, that's the case for the vast majority of verbs in english, although there are exceptions -- irregular verbs for which the past participle and the past tense look different.
for instance, the last two verbs in the above list are among these irregular verbs:
* "thrown" is exclusively a past participle; the past tense is "threw"
* "taken" is exclusively a past participle; the past tense is "took"

i'll illustrate why this is a correct construction with one of those two participles, since it's easier to see that it's NOT a past-tense verb:
after the earthquake, janice came home to find her house in ruins, its roof severed from the walls and thrown fifty feet horizontally.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:5 members

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:26 am
I will also go with A

B and its
C and has
D and its
E and to have

these are not fit with sentrence

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:09 am

by aspirant2010 » Sat Apr 24, 2010 7:46 am
I am on A........wats the OA?

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 12:42 pm
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by vineetbatra » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:09 am
lunarpower wrote:
it's not a past-tense verb; it's actually a PAST PARTICIPLE. in other words, it's in the same class as words such as
dedicated
considered
thrown
taken


[/i]
Thanks again for the reply Ron. This point raises 2 questions in my mind
1. First of all how do we identify whether a particular verb form used is simple past or past participle when it is the same for both (bough, bought, fought fought); other words, how did you know that thought is acting as a Past participle and not simple Past

2. Since it is Past Participle then I will assume that it is acting as a modifier and it is modifying the noun immediately preceding it i.e. water and/or 60 square miles or 60 square miles of water.

Cheers,

Vineet

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Sun Apr 25, 2010 3:55 am
consider as

consider to be

are wrong

C,D and E are out

"and with" in A have no "with" at the begining. A is out

B is right

B is absolute phrase which includes noun and adjective and which show a state simultaneous with action of main clause

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:53 am
vineetbatra wrote:Thanks again for the reply Ron. This point raises 2 questions in my mind
1. First of all how do we identify whether a particular verb form used is simple past or past participle when it is the same for both (bough, bought, fought fought); other words, how did you know that thought is acting as a Past participle and not simple Past
well, i would imagine that there are two ways to do this, the first of which (in my mind) is really the only feasible one:

1, look at tons and tons of examples of correct constructions involving each of these forms, until you can recognize analogous constructions on sight.
this is pretty much the way the human brain is made to absorb language -- by imitation, rather than by analysis. (you are not going to find a child alive who absorbs his first language through the use of systematic analysis. while learning second languages later in life is certainly different, and much harder, then learning one's first language in childhood, all evidence points to the fact that imitative learning is still by far the easiest.)

2, somehow try to cobble together an exhaustive list of every possible use of these forms, try to memorize all of them, and then (probably even harder than those first two steps, as hard as those already are) somehow train yourself to the point where you can recognize any and all of those forms within the distinct time window provided for sentence correction!

i really don't think at the second of these is very reasonable, which pretty much leaves you with the first.

as a hint, one of the best ways you can educate yourself about the proper use of grammatical forms is:
* search them as search terms on the internet
* find grammar sites that contain correct illustrations alongside incorrect ones
* compile a list of those illustrations
* look it over and make sure you know which ones are correct and which ones are incorrect

if you are really dedicated, you can put each individual example -- a healthy selection of both correct and incorrect ones -- onto a flash card, and then, on the back of the flash card, write either CORRECT or INCORRECT and then give a very brief identification of the grammatical structure at hand.
remember, don't go overboard with the identification and/or classification; the whole point is that you primarily develop the ability to RECOGNIZE the forms, without having to name them in order to do so!
2. Since it is Past Participle then I will assume that it is acting as a modifier and it is modifying the noun immediately preceding it i.e. water and/or 60 square miles or 60 square miles of water.
yeah, that's how those work -- they modify nouns. unless there are other intervening modifiers, they generally default to the closest noun.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 1:49 am
Thanked: 9 times
Followed by:3 members

by kaulnikhil » Sun May 02, 2010 2:36 am
netcaesar wrote:I do not know how to solve this SC. Please, help!!!

With surface temperatures estimated at minus 230 degrees Farenheit, Jupiter's moon Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, and with 60 square miles of water thought to be frozen from top to bottom

A) Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, and with
B) Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, its
C) Europa has long been considered as far too cold to support life and has
D) Europa, long considered as far too cold to support life, and its
E) Europa, long considered to be far too cold to support life, and to have
The OA B uses its hence according to the pronoun referend ruled .. its should refer to Jupiter because the noun Jupiter is in possesive case. In that case wont its in 60 square miles of water thought to be frozen from top to bottommodify Jupiter rather the Europa. ..Plz Help ..!!

Legendary Member
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:10 pm
Thanked: 50 times
Followed by:4 members

by akhpad » Sat May 29, 2010 1:26 am
Hi Ron,

I would like to clarify my understanding from your explanation and examples.
lunarpower wrote:
this sort of modifier (COMMA + ABSTRACT NOUN) can be used to refer back to the WHOLE IDEA of the preceding clause.

let's say that scientists discover that X is 60 percent of Y, and that they are shocked by this finding.

then:
recent studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, which has shocked many in the scientific community.
incorrect.
this sentence implies that Y itself has shocked many in the scientific community. that's not true.

recent studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, a finding that has shocked many in the scientific community.
or
recent studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, a statistic that has shocked many in the scientific community.
these are correct.
the abstract noun "finding" or "statistic" may refer to the whole idea of the preceding clause.
I believe that this is an absolute phrase, which contain noun and noun modifier.


lunarpower wrote:
on the other hand, COMMA + CONCRETE NOUN is normally used to refer to the preceding noun (much like "which").

for instance:
james went for dinner and drinks with mr. easton, a consultant from the west end.
here, "a consultant" is a concrete noun. it only describes "mr. easton", not the whole idea of the preceding clause.
I believe that this is an appositive phrase.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:08 am
Thanked: 6 times

by SmarpanGamt » Sat May 29, 2010 11:15 am
umaa wrote:
netcaesar wrote:I do not know how to solve this SC. Please, help!!!

With surface temperatures estimated at minus 230 degrees Farenheit, Jupiter's moon Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, and with 60 square miles of water thought to be frozen from top to bottom

A) Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, and with
B) Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, its
C) Europa has long been considered as far too cold to support life and has
D) Europa, long considered as far too cold to support life, and its
E) Europa, long considered to be far too cold to support life, and to have
Idiom is consider. So, consider as, consider to be are all wrong.

Eliminate C, D and E.

Hi Umma

Y do we need conjuction IMO B , Its refers to Europa . Usage of " with" in " A" changes the meaning of the sentence what is OA ?

B is worng. A COMMA can't be a conjunction for two clauses.

IMO A.

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 7:57 am
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:600

by crisro » Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:30 am
capnx wrote:
netcaesar wrote:I do not know how to solve this SC. Please, help!!!

With surface temperatures estimated at minus 230 degrees Farenheit, Jupiter's moon Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, and with 60 square miles of water though to be frozen from top to bottom

A) Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, and with
B) Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, its
C) Europa has long been considered as far too cold to support life and has
D) Europa, long considered as far too cold to support life, and its
E) Europa, long considered to be far too cold to support life, and to have
please make sure you type the question correctly. One word can make a huge difference:

With surface temperatures estimated at minus 230 degrees Farenheit, Jupiter's moon Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, and with 60 square miles of water thought to be frozen from top to bottom.

as you said "a word can make a huge difference", in the official question is though not thought

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:08 am
Thanked: 6 times

by SmarpanGamt » Tue Oct 18, 2011 1:08 am
what is OA ?

IMO B

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:23 am
lunarpower wrote:
duongthang wrote:"main clause, noun+which clause/adjective"---she is beautiful, a fact I know---

in this pattern, noun phrase is a summary of main clause.
this is indeed a correct pattern, but it only works if the noun in question is an ABSTRACT noun (i.e., not a concrete object, person, etc). such as "activity", "finding", "idea", "notion", "statistic", etc.

this sort of modifier (COMMA + ABSTRACT NOUN) can be used to refer back to the WHOLE IDEA of the preceding clause.

let's say that scientists discover that X is 60 percent of Y, and that they are shocked by this finding.

then:
recent studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, which has shocked many in the scientific community.
incorrect.
this sentence implies that Y itself has shocked many in the scientific community. that's not true.

recent studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, a finding that has shocked many in the scientific community.
or
recent studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, a statistic that has shocked many in the scientific community.
these are correct.
the abstract noun "finding" or "statistic" may refer to the whole idea of the preceding clause.

in fact, that's the whole point of these modifiers. they are fatally awkward in spoken language (i.e., you can NEVER EVER say them out loud), but they do things that more "normal-sounding" modifiers (such as "which") aren't allowed to do.

for 2 problems that use this sort of modifier, see:
* #59 in the purple OG verbal supplement (in which this sort of modifier is present in the NON underlined section)
* #79 in the same source (in which it's present in the correct answer choice)

--

on the other hand, COMMA + CONCRETE NOUN is normally used to refer to the preceding noun (much like "which").

for instance:
james went for dinner and drinks with mr. easton, a consultant from the west end.
here, "a consultant" is a concrete noun. it only describes "mr. easton", not the whole idea of the preceding clause.

james went for dinner and drinks with mr. easton, an outing that was much more enjoyable than working all day.
here, "an outing" is abstract. it describes the whole previous clause (going for dinner and drinks).
RON, I WISH YOU EXPLAIN MORE. THANK A LOT.

in B, the correct answer, "its...." refer to a specific noun which possibly is far from this phrase, but, "its...." is still in MODIFYING RELATION with main clause. So, I want to summarize as following, pls, confirm correctness.

COMMA ABSTRACT NOUN MODIFIES MAIN CLAUSE

COMMA CONCRETE NOUN CAN
-MODIFY ONLY A NOUN IN MAIN CLAUSE , or
-REFER TO A NOUN IN MAIN CLAUSE BUT STILL MODIFY MAIN CLAUSE.

Are those correct", pls, confirm Ron, thank for your help

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 934
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:16 am
Location: AAMCHI MUMBAI LOCAL
Thanked: 63 times
Followed by:14 members

by [email protected] » Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:20 am
With surface temperatures estimated at minus 230 degrees Farenheit, Jupiter's moon Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, and with 60 square miles of water thought to be frozen from top to bottom

A) Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, and with
B) Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, its
C) Europa has long been considered as far too cold to support life and has
D) Europa, long considered as far too cold to support life, and its
E) Europa, long considered to be far too cold to support life, and to have


It comes down to A and B. Somehow the option A does not complete the sentence or the clause.

B is not a good sentence but somehow the best out of all the 5 options being given...

Hence B. A bit difficult to understand...
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT

LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!

Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.