integers/ primes

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 3:00 pm

integers/ primes

by brandonw3 » Thu Oct 16, 2008 8:34 am
If k is a positive integer, is k the square of an integer?

1) k is divisible by 4
2) k is divisible by exactly four different prime numbers

does statement 2 have a "yes" outcome?

thanks

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:11 am
Location: Washington, DC

by jonnyais » Thu Oct 16, 2008 12:11 pm
I don't think so...

I just took the 4 smallest primes, 2*3*5*7=210, which is not the square of an integer. maybe I'm misunderstanding the question

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

Re: integers/ primes

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:10 pm
brandonw3 wrote:If k is a positive integer, is k the square of an integer?

1) k is divisible by 4
2) k is divisible by exactly four different prime numbers

does statement 2 have a "yes" outcome?

thanks
The wording of (2) may be a bit tricky.

(2) does NOT say that k has only 4 prime factors - it says that k has only 4 different prime factors.

For example, k could be:

2*2*3*3*5*5*7*7, which would be a perfect square.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:05 am
yep, stuart is right. just to clarify, make sure that you understand the following:
if the problem says that a number is divisible by the prime factor p, then you know NOTHING about how many times the number is divisible by that prime factor.

the prime factor could appear only once, or it could appear multiple times (e.g., each prime in stuart's example appears twice).
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:39 pm

by ddo » Fri Oct 17, 2008 6:49 am
Answer would be E then.?

K could be 2*2*3*5*7 = 420 multiple of 4 but not perfect square
or could be 2*2*3*3*5*5*7*7 multiple of 4 and perfect sq.

I think the rule is: a sq of a prime nbr has always 3 factors

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:54 am
ddo wrote:Answer would be E then.?

K could be 2*2*3*5*7 = 420 multiple of 4 but not perfect square
or could be 2*2*3*3*5*5*7*7 multiple of 4 and perfect sq.

I think the rule is: a sq of a prime nbr has always 3 factors
correct.
your stated rule is also correct, although it's completely irrelevant to the problem at hand.

here's a more general fact: all perfect squares - and ONLY perfect squares - have an odd number of total factors.
there are some clever little ways to show that this is true, but, for gmat style time management, you should just know it without having to mentally re-derive it every time.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 6:16 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by dally_gmat » Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:05 pm
Perfect square is same as square or it is sub set of squares??

May be lame question..but i m confused..:
lunarpower wrote:
ddo wrote:Answer would be E then.?

here's a more general fact: all perfect squares - and ONLY perfect squares - have an odd number of total factors.
there are some clever little ways to show that this is true, but, for gmat style time management, you should just know it without having to mentally re-derive it every time.
:D :)

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Fri Oct 17, 2008 1:36 pm
dally_gmat wrote:Perfect square is same as square or it is sub set of squares??
perfect squares are integers that are squares of other integers: 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, ...

therefore, the answer to your question is probably "it's the same as 'square' ", but the gmat (as will as other formal mathematical resources) is very exacting about usage: the unadorned word "square" would be used only to refer to a geometrical figure.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron