Problem solving - Ratio / Proportion

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 4:53 am
Thanked: 12 times
Followed by:3 members

Problem solving - Ratio / Proportion

by guerrero » Thu Jun 07, 2012 10:44 am
Hello All, Please asssit me understanding & solving this problem.

A tea merchant buys 2 varieties of tea - the price of the first being twice of the second. He sells the mixture at 17.50$ per kg, thereby making a profit of 25%. If the ratio of the amounts of the first tea and the second tea in the mixture is 2:3, then find the cost of each tea?

thank you in anticipation !

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 768
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:18 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA
Thanked: 387 times
Followed by:140 members

by Mike@Magoosh » Thu Jun 07, 2012 3:49 pm
guerrero wrote:A tea merchant buys 2 varieties of tea - the price of the first being twice of the second. He sells the mixture at 17.50$ per kg, thereby making a profit of 25%. If the ratio of the amounts of the first tea and the second tea in the mixture is 2:3, then find the cost of each tea?
Hi, there. I'm happy to help with this one. :)

Let me first say -- holy schnikies! This is a challenging question: I would say in the 800+ region.

Let's start with a little backwards calculation. The price of $17.50/kg represents a 25% profit, so it's a 25% increase over the cost.

C*1.25 = 17.25

C = 17.50/1.25 = 14

The mixture costs the tea merchant $14/kg.

He mixes the teas in a 2:3 ratio, and gets one kilogram. 2 + 3 = 5, so he uses 2/5 kg = 0.4 kg of Tea #1 and 3/5 kg = 0.6 kg of Tea #2.

Now, Tea #1 has a price of 2P/kg, and Tea #2 has a price of P/kg.
The 2/5 kg of Tea #1 costs 4P/5.
The 3/5 kg of Tea #2 costs 3P/5
The combined cost is 4P/5 + 3P/5 = 7P/5 for the full kilogram, and this should equal $14.

14 = 7P/5 ---> 70 = 7P, so P = 10 and 2P = 20

The first tea costs $20 and the second tea costs $10.

Check: Suppose he marks up the price to a profit first. The cost of Tea #1 with a 25% profit is $25/kg. The cost of Tea #2 with a 25% profit is $12.50/kg. Now, make a mixture with 2 kg of the first and 3 kg of the second. That would cost 2*(25) + 3*(12.50) = $87.50 for the entire 5 kg mixture. It would have a per-kilogram price of 87.50/5 = $17.50, which is the price the merchant was charging, so our answers work.

Does all that make sense?

Here's another practice question with percent increases:
https://gmat.magoosh.com/questions/30
When you submit your answer to that, the next page will have the complete video explanation.

Let me know if you have any further questions.

Mike :-)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jun 07, 2012 9:21 pm
guerrero wrote:Hello All, Please asssit me understanding & solving this problem.

A tea merchant buys 2 varieties of tea - the price of the first being twice of the second. He sells the mixture at 17.50$ per kg, thereby making a profit of 25%. If the ratio of the amounts of the first tea and the second tea in the mixture is 2:3, then find the cost of each tea?

thank you in anticipation !
Cost of the mixture:
A profit of 25% implies that the selling price is equal to 5/4 of the cost:
17.5 = (5/4)c
c = (4/5)(17.5) = $14 per kilogram.

To determine what fraction of the cost is spent on each tea, plug in dummy values that satisfy the given conditions.
Since the first tea costs twice as much as the second, let the cost of the first tea = 2 and the cost of the second tea = 1.
Since the ratio of the teas is 2:3, every 5 kilograms of the mixture is composed of 2 kilograms of the first tea and 3 kilograms of the second tea.
The cost of 2 kilograms of the first tea = 2*2 = 4.
The cost of 3 kilograms of the second tea = 3*1 = 3.
Since 4+3=7, of every $7 spent on the mixture, $4 is spent on the first tea.
Thus, the fraction spent on the first tea = 4/7.

The actual cost of 5 kilograms of the mixture = 5*14 = 70.

Thus:
The total cost of 2 kilograms of the first tea = (4/7)70 = 40.
The cost per kilogram of the first tea = 40/2 = 20.

The total cost of 3 kilograms of the second tea = 70-40 = 30.
The cost per kilogram of the second tea = 30/3 = 10.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 4:24 pm
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:1 members

by 1947 » Thu Jun 07, 2012 9:39 pm
Once we find the actual price of tea is $14. we can also use weighted mean equation
2/3 = (14-x)/2x-14
x= 10
2x =20

tough question indeed....in first go I used the figure 17.5 instead of finding 14.
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button. Thanks

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Jun 07, 2012 9:43 pm
guerrero wrote:Hello All, Please asssit me understanding & solving this problem.

A tea merchant buys 2 varieties of tea - the price of the first being twice of the second. He sells the mixture at 17.50$ per kg, thereby making a profit of 25%. If the ratio of the amounts of the first tea and the second tea in the mixture is 2:3, then find the cost of each tea?

thank you in anticipation !
Hi!

As the other experts noted, this is a really tough math problem - which is why, almost certainly, the best way to approach it is strategically.

If you had provided answer choices (please always provide the choices!), we could have backsolved. When you have a very complicated word problem with a concrete question and information, and the answer choices are numbers, backsolving is frequently the quickest way to solve.

In fact, the better you're doing on the test the more you benefit from alternative approaches like backsolving and picking numbers.

Stuart
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 4:53 am
Thanked: 12 times
Followed by:3 members

by guerrero » Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:47 am
Sweet! thank you very much for taking time in solving this problem . The explanation here helped me build my foundation in Ratio/ Propotion .

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 613
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:17 am
Location: madrid
Thanked: 171 times
Followed by:64 members
GMAT Score:790

by kevincanspain » Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:54 pm
You could call the price of the two varieties 2p and p.
The amount of the two varieties 2x and 3x

Thus the average purchase cost is (4xp + 3xp)/5x = 7x/5

The selling price would have to be 5/4 of the average purchase cost i.e. 7p/4 = 1.75p

Thus p= 10
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid