What is the greatest prime factor of 4^(17) - 2^28?
I thought it would be 2 but apparently not
Prime Factorization
This topic has expert replies
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:47 pm
- harsh.champ
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1132
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:38 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 64 times
- Followed by:6 members
- GMAT Score:760
Now,(2^28) can be written as (4^14).skorolkova wrote:What is the greatest prime factor of 4^(17) - 2^28?
I thought it would be 2 but apparently not
So, 4^(17) - 2^28 becomes 4^(17) - 4^(14)
= (4^14)[(4^3)-1]
= (4^14)[63]
=(4^14) [7x(3^2)]
So, the greatest prime factor is 7.
Last edited by harsh.champ on Sun Feb 07, 2010 2:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button ![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.
"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker![Razz :P](./images/smilies/razz.png)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.
"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/razz.png)
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 2:47 pm
harsh.champ wrote:I am also getting 2 onlyskorolkova wrote:What is the greatest prime factor of 4^(17) - 2^28?
I thought it would be 2 but apparently not
The answer says 7... I'm wondering if that's related to the 28... but then why not 17?
- harsh.champ
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1132
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:38 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 64 times
- Followed by:6 members
- GMAT Score:760
Hey skorolkova,skorolkova wrote:harsh.champ wrote:I am also getting 2 onlyskorolkova wrote:What is the greatest prime factor of 4^(17) - 2^28?
I thought it would be 2 but apparently not
The answer says 7... I'm wondering if that's related to the 28... but then why not 17?
I found out my mistake.The answer indeed is 7 only.
I was not considering the negative sign and just answered the question taking both the terms as separate entities.
I think you also made the same mistake.
Just check my solution post and tell whether it is doubtful .
Ofcourse,it is not 28 or 17. The power is never related to the divisor in any way.
The method of prime factorization itself goes like N = (a^x)(b^y)(c^z) where a,b,c are the prime divisors and the powers don't have any relation with the prime factors.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button ![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.
"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker![Razz :P](./images/smilies/razz.png)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)
Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.
"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/razz.png)