Tax enforcement

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 439
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 8:32 am
Location: India
Thanked: 34 times
Followed by:28 members

Tax enforcement

by sivaelectric » Sun May 29, 2011 12:03 pm
Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans for simplified tax laws will save money through the elimination of much of the complex apparatus currently devoted to enforcing the collection of income taxes. This is a preposterous suggestion since it is obvious that any tax, no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts.

The conclusions above would be most strongly supported by which of the following facts, if true?
  • A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces.
    B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes.
    C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity.
    D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget.
    E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals.
If I am wrong correct me :), If my post helped let me know by clicking the Thanks button ;).

Chitra Sivasankar Arunagiri

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:34 am
Location: India
Thanked: 310 times
Followed by:123 members
GMAT Score:750

by cans » Sun May 29, 2011 1:00 pm
IMO A

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:52 pm
Location: Dallas
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by hardikm » Sun May 29, 2011 4:46 pm
Conclusion: no matter how simple, will require an enforcement and collection agency to ensure that citizens comply with the law and contribute their required amounts.
Premise: Proponents of the so-called, 'Flat Tax' often argue that their plans for simplified tax laws will save money through the elimination of much of the complex apparatus currently devoted to enforcing the collection of income taxes.


A. In a survey of present and historical taxation agencies, it is found that there is little relationship between the size of the tax collection agency and the complexity of the tax code it enforces. Support
B. some flat tax advocates suggest a fixed percentage of an individual' income be collected annually whereas others focus on a value-added tax that is collected at each retail purchase the individual makes. Out of Scope
C. though described as flat, some of these alternative tax proposals actually incorporate considerable complexity. support
D. many flat tax proposals depend on the cost savings of a projected reduction in tax collection costs in order to maintain a balanced budget. weaken
E. polls indicate that despite the initial appeal of a simplified tax code, voters are skeptical of flat tax proposals. Irrelevant
IMO A

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 439
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 8:32 am
Location: India
Thanked: 34 times
Followed by:28 members

by sivaelectric » Sun May 29, 2011 8:20 pm
OA A
If I am wrong correct me :), If my post helped let me know by clicking the Thanks button ;).

Chitra Sivasankar Arunagiri