I am sure that you are looking at the sentence in a different meaning.paes wrote:Read my post above. I am not convinced with the OA-D.
C looks better to me, at leas no grammar mistake.
Thats fine.. let us see at why C is Right/Wrong.
First, Can you tell me why comma is needed after elderly patients?
Second, Soldiers and soldiers who broke their legs arrived at the camp.
Is this sentence not looking awkward?
Third, It is important to replicate the intended meaning of the sentence. The main sentence is not even close in meaning to what you are mentioning.
I do not understand why You think D is grammatically incorrect.
elders (who take expansive drugs c) .could reduce is wrong.paes wrote:Elderly patients, many of them(whom) take expensive brand-name medications daily, could reduce their medical costs by switching to generic drugs and making lifestyle changes.
from the meaning, the sentence should be -> elders (who take expansive drugs c) .could reduce .....
Let the elders be E1,E2,E3,E4...
Of these E2,E3 take expensive medicines.
You are saying that the sentence is speaking only about E2 and E3
But infact the sentence is trying to speak about all E1,E2,E3....
It is just giving additional information that many of E1,E2,E3... take expensive medicines.
it is not redundant. Meaning is different.
Typed a lot
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smile.png)