Editorialist: Drivers with a large number of demerit points who additionally have been convicted of a serious driving-relative offense should either be sentenced to jail or be forced to receive driver reeducation, since to do otherwise would be to allow a crime to go unpunished. Only if such drivers are likely to be made more responsible drivers should driver re-education be recommended for them. Unfortunately, it is always almost impossible to make drivers with a large number of demerit points more responsible drivers.
  If the editorialist's statements are true, they provide the most support for which one of the following?
  (A) Drivers with a large number of demerit points who have been convicted of a serious driving-related offense should be sent to jail.
  (B) Driver re-education offers the best chance of making drivers with a large number of demerit points responsible drivers.
  (C) Driver re-education is not a harsh enough punishment for anyone convicted of a serious driving-related offense who has also
  (D) Driver re-education should not be recommended for those who have committed no serious
  (E) Drivers with a larger number of demerit points but no conviction for a serious driving-related offense should receive driver re-education rather than jail
Driving offense
This topic has expert replies
- reply2spg
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
- Thanked: 27 times
- GMAT Score:570
IMO C is best here. Passage is continuously focused upon re-education and that is the key here. After reading the passage I started looking something, which tells me that after taking the education driver is not responsible. C does the same thing. Therefore, C is good here. What is OA? I took 2 minutes.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:47 pm
- Thanked: 10 times
IMO A
Drivers with a large number of demerit points should either be sentenced to jail or be forced to receive driver reeducation.
But last sentence of the psg ruled out reeducation part. So they should be sent to jail. So its A.
Drivers with a large number of demerit points should either be sentenced to jail or be forced to receive driver reeducation.
But last sentence of the psg ruled out reeducation part. So they should be sent to jail. So its A.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1119
- Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 am
- Thanked: 29 times
- Followed by:3 members
- hardik.jadeja
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:12 am
- Thanked: 87 times
- Followed by:5 members
- GMAT Score:730
Option C is out of scope, i think.diebeatsthegmat wrote: can you explain why OA is A instead of C?
The argument goes something like this.
Drivers with a large number of demerit points should be either
1) sentenced to jail
or
2) be forced to receive driver reeducation
Then we are told that only if such drivers are likely to be made more responsible drivers should driver re-education be recommended for them.
We are further told that Drivers with a large number of demerit points are almost impossible to be responsible drivers. So this statement rules out one of the two possible actions suggested against the drivers. We are left with only one option and that is to sent them to jail.
There is nowhere mention of the word harsh here. It is not given that punishment should depend harshness. Initially, the argument suggests two options and later rules out one option based on additional information.
Hope that helps...
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 5:38 am
- Thanked: 10 times
Dont agree with A here.hardik.jadeja wrote:Option C is out of scope, i think.diebeatsthegmat wrote: can you explain why OA is A instead of C?
The argument goes something like this.
Drivers with a large number of demerit points should be either
1) sentenced to jail
or
2) be forced to receive driver reeducation
Then we are told that only if such drivers are likely to be made more responsible drivers should driver re-education be recommended for them.
We are further told that Drivers with a large number of demerit points are almost impossible to be responsible drivers. So this statement rules out one of the two possible actions suggested against the drivers. We are left with only one option and that is to sent them to jail.
There is nowhere mention of the word harsh here. It is not given that punishment should depend harshness. Initially, the argument suggests two options and later rules out one option based on additional information.
Hope that helps...
Unfortunately, it is always almost impossible to make drivers with a large number of demerit points more responsible drivers.
This does not prove that they should be sent to Jail always..
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Shawshank Redemtion -- Hope is still alive ...
Shawshank Redemtion -- Hope is still alive ...
- hardik.jadeja
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 2:12 am
- Thanked: 87 times
- Followed by:5 members
- GMAT Score:730
Well I did notice the "almost impossible" part that you highlighted.. But A looks best among the given options. All the other options are 100% wrong.Shawshank wrote:[
Dont agree with A here.
Unfortunately, it is always almost impossible to make drivers with a large number of demerit points more responsible drivers.
This does not prove that they should be sent to Jail always..
And as far as I know, verbal section on GMAT isn't like the quant section. Sometimes you may have to choose the best possible answer. The correct answers of verbal section may not be 100% correct like answers of quant questions.
This is true not only for CR, but also for SC and RC. I am sure you must have come across such SC questions.