Since 1966, roughly 21 percent of those enlisted in the USMC had reached
an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years.
(A) had reached an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years
(B) have reached an E-5 ranking in less than three years
(C) have reached an E-5 ranking in under three years
(D) had reached an E-5 ranking in less than three years
(E) have reached an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years
guys any thought ??
any thought!!!
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 12:19 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:2 members
- Birottam Dutta
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 342
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:50 am
- Thanked: 214 times
- Followed by:19 members
- GMAT Score:740
Here, what we mainly need to choose is the had/have and the less/fewer than part.
Coming to the original sentence, the sentence starts off with "Since 1966,..." this implies that it is an ongoing activity from 1966 to present. So, here we need to choose have and not had. Had implies only past tense whereas have suggests that from past to current, so we choose have.
So, A and D are eliminated.
Now, come to less than fewer than.
Fewer than is used for countable nouns which have plurals such as dogs, newspapers, umbrellas, men,etc. For example, there are fewer boys present today, than there were yesterday.
Less is used for uncountable nouns or does not have a plural such time, rain, money, Air, water etc.
Example: I have less money now than I had a month back.
Less is also used when a Number is on its own and associated with its unit of measurement.
Example: Thier marriage lasted less than two years.
Now one thing to note here is that "I have fewer than two dollars" is not correct but "I have less than two dollars" is correct, as dollars is the unit of measurement and two is the quantity.
Using this logic, in the above sentence, less than three years is the correct version.
So, the correct choice is B!
Coming to the original sentence, the sentence starts off with "Since 1966,..." this implies that it is an ongoing activity from 1966 to present. So, here we need to choose have and not had. Had implies only past tense whereas have suggests that from past to current, so we choose have.
So, A and D are eliminated.
Now, come to less than fewer than.
Fewer than is used for countable nouns which have plurals such as dogs, newspapers, umbrellas, men,etc. For example, there are fewer boys present today, than there were yesterday.
Less is used for uncountable nouns or does not have a plural such time, rain, money, Air, water etc.
Example: I have less money now than I had a month back.
Less is also used when a Number is on its own and associated with its unit of measurement.
Example: Thier marriage lasted less than two years.
Now one thing to note here is that "I have fewer than two dollars" is not correct but "I have less than two dollars" is correct, as dollars is the unit of measurement and two is the quantity.
Using this logic, in the above sentence, less than three years is the correct version.
So, the correct choice is B!
Folks please check this out
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7p56NzAVKc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7p56NzAVKc
- ananyaray9
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 5:29 am
- Followed by:1 members
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 7:09 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:2 members
basically when comparison between quantities involving units is involved less than is used even if it is a countable noun
Ankita
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 4:24 pm
- Thanked: 13 times
- Followed by:1 members
since points that have is needed not had so B,C,E remain...out of these I will choose B....not sure why ?nafiul9090 wrote:Since 1966, roughly 21 percent of those enlisted in the USMC had reached
an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years.
(A) had reached an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years
(B) have reached an E-5 ranking in less than three years
(C) have reached an E-5 ranking in under three years
(D) had reached an E-5 ranking in less than three years
(E) have reached an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years
guys any thought ??
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button. Thanks
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 6:18 am
- Thanked: 16 times
- Followed by:6 members
As per me, correct answer is E.
Not sure why Birottam beleives that less should be used instead of fewer.
Here three years is surely a countable entity and thus the use of fewer is justified.
In case of dollars, we say I have less than 3 dollars because saying
I have fewer than 3 dollars would indicate saying that I have literally fewer that 3, 1 dollar bills.
But here fewer than 3 years seems correct.
Not sure why Birottam beleives that less should be used instead of fewer.
Here three years is surely a countable entity and thus the use of fewer is justified.
In case of dollars, we say I have less than 3 dollars because saying
I have fewer than 3 dollars would indicate saying that I have literally fewer that 3, 1 dollar bills.
But here fewer than 3 years seems correct.
If you've liked my post, let me know by pressing the thanks button.
- avik.ch
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:15 am
- Thanked: 149 times
- Followed by:32 members
- GMAT Score:760
less : it can act as an adjective ( noun modifier), adverb( verb modifier ) and as a nounnafiul9090 wrote:Since 1966, roughly 21 percent of those enlisted in the USMC had reached
an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years.
(A) had reached an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years
(B) have reached an E-5 ranking in less than three years
(C) have reached an E-5 ranking in under three years
(D) had reached an E-5 ranking in less than three years
(E) have reached an E-5 ranking in fewer than three years
guys any thought ??
lower/fewer : always act as an adjective
"in" being a preposition is always followed by a noun - Only B and D stands out.
Since X,....- present perfect tense should be used and not past perfect. "Since 1966" is an adverb of time for an events started in the past and still continuing.
Hope this helps !!
- [email protected]
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:16 am
- Location: AAMCHI MUMBAI LOCAL
- Thanked: 63 times
- Followed by:14 members
Birottam Dutta!!! what he said is absolutely correct. The reason is that in choosing between the
countable and uncountable nouns, there are 4 exceptions, namely:
1. Time 2. Distance 3. Speed and 4. amount or money
This thing actually is given in the spidey's notes and the sahil's notes.
Kindly refer to them.
By the way thanks Birottam...
countable and uncountable nouns, there are 4 exceptions, namely:
1. Time 2. Distance 3. Speed and 4. amount or money
This thing actually is given in the spidey's notes and the sahil's notes.
Kindly refer to them.
By the way thanks Birottam...
IT IS TIME TO BEAT THE GMAT
LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!
Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
LEARNING, APPLICATION AND TIMING IS THE FACT OF GMAT AND LIFE AS WELL... KEEP PLAYING!!!
Whenever you feel that my post really helped you to learn something new, please press on the 'THANK' button.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 6:18 am
- Thanked: 16 times
- Followed by:6 members
Thanks for the reply.
Yes, there is more to it.
We use less/more with following countable quantities.
1.Time 2.Money and 3.Distance.
Confirmed here by Knewton https://www.beatthegmat.com/an-odd-st-t70077.html
Yes, there is more to it.
We use less/more with following countable quantities.
1.Time 2.Money and 3.Distance.
Confirmed here by Knewton https://www.beatthegmat.com/an-odd-st-t70077.html
If you've liked my post, let me know by pressing the thanks button.
- avik.ch
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:15 am
- Thanked: 149 times
- Followed by:32 members
- GMAT Score:760
I do not think there is any point in looking at the countable and uncountable quantities here. This difference comes only when "less" and "fewer" both acts as an adjective.
Here, "less" is clearly taking the noun slot - the object of the preposition and so "fewer" cant be used.
Considering some good example stated above :
I have less money now than I had a month back. - since "less" is an adjective. here the concept of countable and uncountable will come.
But, in this example
Their marriage lasted less than two years.
here "less than two year" is an adverb of time and hence "less" should be used and not "fewer".
Hope this helps !!
Here, "less" is clearly taking the noun slot - the object of the preposition and so "fewer" cant be used.
Considering some good example stated above :
I have less money now than I had a month back. - since "less" is an adjective. here the concept of countable and uncountable will come.
But, in this example
Their marriage lasted less than two years.
here "less than two year" is an adverb of time and hence "less" should be used and not "fewer".
Hope this helps !!