GPREP SC- 13

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:17 am
Location: NY
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:11 members

GPREP SC- 13

by abhasjha » Wed Jul 02, 2014 10:31 pm
In a blow to those who still harbored the illusion that E-mail exchanges are private, a watchdog group recently uncovered a trick for enabling an interloper to rig an E-mail message so that this person will be privy to any comments that a recipient had added as the message is forwarded to others or sent back and forth.

A. who still harbored the illusion that E-mail exchanges are private, a watchdog group recently uncovered a trick for enabling an interloper to rig an E-mail message so that this person will be privy to any comments that a recipient had added

B. who had still been harboring the illusion that E-mail exchanges are private, a watchdog group recently uncovered a trick for enabling an interloper to rig an E-mail message so that this person was privy to any comments that a recipient might have added.

C. who still were harboring the illusion that E-mail exchanges are private, a watchdog group recently uncovered a trick enabling an interloper to rig and E-mail message so that this person is privy to any comments that a recipient would add.

D. still harboring the illusion that E-mail exchange are private , a watchdog group recently uncovered a trick that enables an interloper to rig an E-mail message so that this person will be privy to any comments that a recipient might add

E. still harboring the illusion that E-mail exchanges had been private, a wathchdog group recently uncovered a trick that will enable an interloper to rig and E-mail message so that this person was privy to any comments that a recipient might add.
_________________

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
Thanked: 448 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:650

by theCodeToGMAT » Thu Jul 03, 2014 4:14 am
{A} Tense issue - recipient had added as the message is forwarded

{B} Tense issue - that a recipient might have added

{C} "who still were harboring the illusion" is awkward; "would" is not correct usage here

{E} Tense issue - had been private

[spoiler]{D}?[/spoiler]
R A H U L

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:17 am
Location: NY
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:11 members

by abhasjha » Fri Jul 04, 2014 10:40 am
The credited response is D .

A detailed explanation is given by gmat pill instructors on gmatclub . here is the link

https://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-pill-pre ... 52791.html

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Fri Jul 04, 2014 2:04 pm
Hi abhasjha,

While this SC is wordy, the correct answer is based on standard verb and pronoun rules.

1) Pronouns - The opening of the sentence states that "In a blow to THOSE...."; here, the word "those" is a pronoun. In the answers, we see that some have an extra pronoun and some don't. Since we already have a pronoun, we do NOT need another pronoun immediately next to it. That extra pronoun is redundant (and unnecessary). Eliminate A, B and C.

2) Verbs - Between D and E, we have the verbs "enables" (present tense) and "will enable" (future tense). Since the watchdog group "recently uncovered the trick", we're dealing with something that's happening in the immediate present. The verb "enables" is required here. Eliminate E.

Final Answer: D

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 3:29 am
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:2 members

by confused13 » Sat Jul 05, 2014 5:09 am
I thought words such as those and these should be explicitly followed by the noun to avoid ambiguity. At least that's what MGMAT SC says?
So I ended up with C.

User avatar
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 10:15 am
Location: India
Thanked: 2 times

by janxavier » Sat Jul 05, 2014 5:26 am
D. still harboring the illusion that E-mail exchange are private , a watchdog group recently uncovered a trick that enables an interloper to rig an E-mail message so that this person will be privy to any comments that a recipient might add

I do not agree with D for the following reason : "E-mail exchange ARE"

IMO none of the answer choices seem right . Please help me out